Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 July 2011

Israel to establish embassy in Juba, South Sudan




I just read on Foreign Policy's Passport that Israel and South Sudan have announced their intention to establish full diplomatic relations.

This is a mutually understandable move. South Sudan basically welcomes everyone who's willing to embrace their sovereignty and independence. The same goes for Israel, even though the state of Israel has obvioulsy been around for much longer than South Sudan. Israel recognizes it can sometimes benefit from unexpected allies in forums like the UN General Assembly.
Another element that might have come into consideration on the Israeli side is that the American christian-right, who love Israel, also adore South Sudan. Sarah Palin's visit to Juba as the nation declared independence is testimony to this general sentiment.

More important however could be Israel's need for a strategic listening post in the area. In recent years, Israel has been suspected of launching a number of air strikes on targets in Sudan.

As far as I can recall, the first recent air strike in Sudan that was alledgedly carried out by Israel came in January 2009. As Israel was engaged in operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip, intelligence indicated Iran might be transporting weapons on a ship to Port Sudan, which would then be trucked to Gaza through Egypt and Sudan. Because it would be politically impossible for Israel to attack a convoy in Egypt, the Air Force was apparently asked to carry out a raid on the convoy while it was still in Sudan. In the lingo of special operations, Israeli PM Olmert confirmed nor denied Israeli involvement, but did get a message across.

A few months later a somewhat similar story emerged. A ship alledgedly carrying Iranian weapons destined for Gaza sank as a result of an explosion, whether it was a torpedo or aerial attack seems unclear. A similar pattern emerges: Sudan blames Israel, which only responds by saying it will act against terror worldwide.

In April 2011, another mysterious attack hit a Sudan. This time, a lone car carrying "an Islamist responsible for supplying weapons to Hamas" was targeted. Sudan was quick to blame Israel, which once more confirmed nor denied involvement.

As far as I know, these are all the incidents in recent years on Sudanese territory that were blamed on Israel. These reports don't seem entirely incredible. Should anyone know of more incidents, do drop a note in the comments..!

With these allegations of Israeli attacks in Sudan in mind, an official Israeli presence in Juba could be of tremendous value for Israeli intelligence gathering in the region. And with the Israelis potentially thinking of getting some arms deals done with the South Sudanese, there's even the prospect of a military-to-military cooperation which would really add weight to Israeli significance in the region.

In sum, even though Israel and South Sudan are just beginning to cuddle up, we could see some seriously interesting developments in their relationship and in the region in years to come!

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

Modelling Israeli insignificance & Indian importance

Haaretz carried a very interesting article for all those political scientists with a thorough belief in modelling the real world. But, don't let it scare you, because all those Middle East junkies worldwide should pay attention as well: even India comes into the picture!

Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies hosted this elaborate wargame that saw participation from senior Israeli policymakers and experts acting as the major players. Unsurprisingly, they all stuck to their prior policy positions. Iran stood by its right to produce uranium for peaceful purposes as long as regime stability was unchallenged, the US in the end grudgingly accepted Tehran's ambitions without resorting to violence and the Israeli's felt ever more estranged from their American ally.

Even after an Israeli commando raid on one of the nuclear installations in Iran, the political dynamics didn't fundamentally change even though Haaretz reported "brief brinksmanship" after this attack. Israeli options were running out, it kept pressing its main ally in Washington to escalate the threat of violence against Iran. However, the US failed to deliver on these Israeli requests.

One of the final options Israel could explore in splendid isolation was the possibility of pressuring India to sever its business ties with Tehran. A measure that would surely shock Iran, potentially to such an extent that the Islamic Republic would reconsider its nuclear ambitions. As it happened, this option wouldn't work either. A nuclear Iran thus became an inevitability.

Model games like these are great thought experiments, but in the real world the MacMillan observation is still of unwavering importance.

What has this game involving Israel, Iran and the US taught us?

  • Ceteris paribus (intransigent leadership in Iran and Israel) Iran will develop a nuclear capability.
  • The Middle East extends as far as New Delhi today, even though most observers don't even list Iran as a Middle Eastern country. Fascinating stuff!

Question to readers: Is this actually proof that having a bomb does make for regional superpower status?